Our editors usually take a particularly close look at the test, and each article is finally checked by the editorial and graphics departments. Unfortunately, a slip-up occurred in the final correction loop when testing the 2026 waveboards in surf 11-12 2025. Because blank lines were inadvertently deleted in the rating fields, certain ratings (+/-/o) have literally disappeared. slipped. The texts and grades of the test boards are not affected by this, but there are some contradictions to the +/-/o ratings, which we will explain here with a large SORRY would like to correct. When reading the test reports, please rely on the individual descriptions of the boards and the scores on page 28 - all the information here is as it should be. We would like to correct all incorrect (+/-/o) ratings below.
The comment that the Flikka waveboard doesn't hold its speed on the wave perfectly slipped up in the print version and appeared in the magazine as a negative rating - here is the corrected version.
Turning potential; features
-
Hold speed
The Goya waveboard is expressly praised in the text for its controlled carving - unfortunately the aspect "carving" then appeared behind a big minus in the magazine - here is the corrected version.
Range of use; control; carving
-
FCS screws
The fact that fins with FCS keys are used in Quatro should be printed as a neutral note (0), but was erroneously printed as a negative aspect. Here, too, the correction with a request for indulgence.
Area of application; control
-
FCS key
In the Severne Pyro, the neutral note ("centre fins quite short") slipped behind the thick minus. Here is the correct representation.
controllability; carving
-
Centre fins quite short
The ratings for the Starboard also slipped in the print edition - the "control in the chop" was noted as a negative aspect. Here is the correct version.
manoeuvrability; glide
-
Control in chop
Note: The Patrik, JP-Australia and We One models are not affected.