A beautiful metallic blue Mercedes S123 was the main actor in the surf story about the correct transport of surfboards. However, this was not originally a report initiated by the surf editorial team, but a highly serious series of tests by Daimer-Benz AG. The company had invested "over 100,000 marks" to provide surfing Mercedes owners with scientifically proven advice on how best to transport their equipment on their favourite vehicle. However, the results "tend to apply to all vehicles", as emphasised at the beginning. After practical tests on the Hockenheimring with a Mercedes 500 (of which there are unfortunately no pictures to be seen), further tests are carried out on the aforementioned Estate in the wind tunnel. One of the most important findings: One board causes around 50 kg of lift, two boards on top of each other around 70 to 75 kg. However, when two boards are strapped next to each other on the roof, a staggering 200 to 230 kg of lift is generated - in other words, forces that pull the front end of the car upwards, making road holding and safety noticeably worse. Although these values were measured at 220 km/h, the trend was also identical at 130 km/h. Another finding: aerodynamic drag is hardly increased in estate cars, but it is in saloons.
A rather inconspicuous half-page advert for "leisure fun in calm conditions": The "swing surf" is apparently a construction that can be plugged into the centreboard box. A swivelling step surface with foot straps is placed on the deck, and a kind of fin construction is connected at the bottom via a mechanism. Standing on the top of the disc and moving rhythmically generates propulsion via the fins. It remains to be seen whether the word "accelerate" is the right choice for the promised 6 km/h, but the whole thing will definitely be interesting.
Darby, Drake, Schweitzer - the invention of windsurfing was often the subject of surf and other publications and, thanks to the dubious business acumen of certain patent holders, even more often in court. It was all the more curious that another protagonist suddenly appeared on the scene in 1982: Peter Chilvers claimed to have built a construction as a twelve-year-old (!) that was vaguely reminiscent of a windsurfing set-up. The board was a hollow wooden construction, the rig a canvas cloth with flexible battens and a wooden louvre as a "boom". There were no pictures or original drawings back in 1982; Chilvers, 36 years old at the time, sketched his design from memory. In the hustle and bustle of patent litigation, Tabor Marine, the British importer of Bic, became aware of Chilvers and called him to court as a witness in the trial against Schweitzer. The judges and lawyers even went in search of evidence at the campsite where Chivers' design had allegedly met an inglorious end as a jetty plank. In fact, the thin evidence was enough for the court to overturn the Schweitzer patent in the UK.
You can click through the entire magazine in the gallery above!
You can click through the entire magazine in the gallery above!

Editor